All insights
AI Product Building AI Agents Future of AI

Enterprise agents need deterministic structure while startups need autonomous loops — same models, different harnesses

Enterprises need deterministic graph-based harnesses for predictability; startups benefit from autonomous loop agents — the harness choice, not the model, determines reliability

@hwchase17 (Harrison Chase) — Everything Gets Rebuilt: Agents, Harnesses, and the New Compute Layer · · 3 connections

Harrison Chase on the enterprise/startup divergence: “At a startup you’re far more likely to build something like Claude Code that is just running in a loop and doing stuff. At an enterprise… you need more precision, you need more control. It’s not okay to have 95%, you need certainty that this step’s always going to happen after that step.”

This manifests in LangChain’s product split:

  • LangGraph (deterministic + non-deterministic mixing) is “much more popular in enterprises”
  • Deep Agents (loop-based) is “much more popular in startups”

The same underlying models power both, but the harness architecture differs fundamentally. Enterprises need to guarantee that specific steps execute in specific order — regulatory compliance, audit trails, approval workflows. Startups can tolerate the model making its own execution decisions.

Chase expects convergence: “We expect that those will make their way for sure” — loop-based agents will enter enterprise as trust builds. But at this moment, the gap is real and product-defining.

This connects to Production agents route routine cases through decision trees, reserving humans for complexity — the enterprise pattern is to use deterministic routing for known cases and LLMs only for ambiguity. Also connects to SaaS survives as the governance and coordination layer — determinism still rules — the deterministic structure IS the governance layer that enterprises require.